My persuasive argument thesis is: There should be a ban on television advertisements aimed at children.
1. What do people already know about my topic?
2. What research has already been done about my topic?
If people ignore me, they should accept risks that advertisements influence on children's mind badly.
http://www.globalissues.org/article/237/children-as-consumers - how frequent children are exposed to advertisements.
http://www.ppu.org.uk/chidren/advertising_toys_eu.html - The influences of advertisements which can be done to children.
3. What are the implications of my argument (What if I'm right? What if I'm right and people ignore me?)
If people ignore me, they should accept risks that advertisements influence on children's mind badly.
My Narration
The advertising industry invests 12 billion dollars per year to product advertisements aimed at children which contains persuasive sugarcoated words especially on TV. According to studies, a child is exposed to 40000 television advertisements a year averagely. They urge children to ask their parents to buy. Parents who take the monetary power, however, get mad at the "Children marketing" because it induces a burden to comply with the requirement. Therefore, I suggest that advertisements aimed at children should be banned.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기